Although the A-Level examination results came out almost two weeks ago and for the most part students were either pleased with the grades they were given (I got in to Cardiff University with AAB in Politics, Economics and History) or deservedly failed, for an unlucky minority there is the hell of having papers sent to be remarked with their places in universities at stake.It is commonly the case amongst bright pupils that entire grades are lost because of a seemingly errant result from 1 of the 6 units per subject. That an examination candidate could contrive to follow up 5 high A or B grades with an E or a U over the six parts of a subject, giving them a much lower overall grade, would not seem possible, apart from when the pupil is poorly prepared or massively misses the point of what they're supposed to be doing. However in the modern examination system, the 'Mark Scheme' is king and content matters little.
As A-Level history students (for example) study over 100 topics between them (with teachers able to choose content both between and within the examination boards - Edexcel, OCR, WJEC) it is very likely that the examiner with whom the paper ends up has no teaching experience of the topic's content. Furthermore, with the preponderence of thoroughly incompetent teachers in the state education system, the exam boards (always desperate for new markers) tailor their Mark Schemes for use by people who have absolutely no idea what the students have learned or written.
Therefore the only thing that matters in many exams is not what has been written but rather the pattern in which it has been written. This means that even the brightest students can answer a question beautifully, including all the necessary content and balancing the two sides of an argument and still fail horribly. If the right buzzwords and blatant allusions to the structure are not included then the incompetent or uninformed markers cannot allow it high marks. This biases the exam system against students with flair and genuine ability and in favour of those who are simply good at doing exams. This is not the exam system which anybody wants yet the cost-cutting, slipshod examination boards will do nothing to rectify it.
Students with an abnormally low score in one exam paper should have their paper immediately, if possible before results are published, re-submitted to an experienced examiner with a teaching knowledge of the content and of the candidate's previous successes. This will produce a fairer exam system which does not routinely sabotage the hopes of intelligent, hard-working students who have otherwise performed highly.





